let avoid the non-sense of jmx under cluster and cluster under jbossmx, please ;)
marcf |-----Original Message----- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Juha |Lindfors |Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 7:05 AM |To: Sacha Labourey; Jboss-Dev |Cc: Bill Burke; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Scott M Stark |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossMX vs. Clustering: modify the build |environment? | | | |I'm gonna go and sit in my own corner in the CVS. I looked at the |CVSROOT/modules and think I figured it out -- we can add aliases |and direct |the checkouts to go whatever directory names we want. | |will deal with build.xml when I get that far | |-- Juha | | |At 08:55 29.11.2001 +0100, Sacha Labourey wrote: |>Hello, |> |>Clustering features are in the jboss-all/cluster package which is in fact |>... the "jbossmx" CVS module. |> |>The reason is that when Stacy Curl originaly submitted clustering code for |>MBEANs, she (he?) put it in this module. Then Jason wrote the new build |>system, then I commited my code in what was appearing to be the cluster |>module. For now, all is nice. |> |>Now, Juha is going to commit JMX code. Consequenlty, it would seem logical |>for him to commit in the CVS jbossmx module... You know what I mean? |> |> Bill and I commit clustering in jboss-all/cluster which in fact |> is ... |>jbossmx |> Juha commits JMX code in jbossmx which in fact is ... |> jboss-all/cluster |> |>Questions: |> - Should we stay like this and all commit at the same place? |> - Should Bill and I move our clustering stuff somewhere else? |> - Should Juha moves the JMX stuff somewhere else? | | |_______________________________________________ |Jboss-development mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
