On 2001.11.29 15:44:21 -0500 David Budworth wrote:
> Is there a reason why your SAR must call the file jboss-service.xml?
not really, just how Marc wrote it.
>
> If we deploy services as XML only, any name *-service.xml works, but in
> a sar we require it to be jboss-service.xml
>
> It seems kind of inconsistent.
>
> It seems usefull to be able to make a sar contain multiple *-service.xml
> files for people who (for deployment ease), repackage several sars into
> one. Right now, we would require them to actually merge the xml to do
> that.
Changing to *service.xml is trivial (change line in
ServiceDeployer.deployLocalClasses to
if (docUrl.getFile().endsWith("-service.xml"))
. Changing to multiple *service.xml files is a little harder and I would
like to wait till I can get my universal deployer finished (where it will
also be trivial).
>
> -David
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
