Bugs item #511632, was opened at 2002-02-01 01:40
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=511632&group_id=22866

Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Thomas Hamann (thomash76)
Assigned to: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom)
Summary: corrupt jbosscmp-jdbc_3_0.dtd

Initial Comment:
Hi,

yesterday i made a download of the latest version of JBoss 3.0.0 from CVS. I noticed 
that the 
JBoss specific DTD for CMP changed - to the worse... ;)  The old jbosscmp-jdbc_3_0.dtd 
(from 
3.0.0alpha) is correct, but in the new one (from 3.0.0DR1) there is a new child 
element of ENTITY 
its name is LIST-CACHE-MAX. This child element is not defined separately/itself ... 
please correct 
that!

<!ELEMENT entity (ejb-name, datasource?, type-mapping?, create-table?, remove-table?, 
read-only?, time-out?, row-locking?, pk-constraint?, read-ahead?, list-cache-max?, 
table-name?, 
cmp-field*, load-groups?, eager-load-group?, lazy-load-groups?, query*)>

Thanks in advance
Thomas

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom)
Date: 2002-02-01 09:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=251431

They were all supposed to be list-cache-max.  The former 
entry max-list-cache was a mistake and should have never 
existed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Thomas Hamann (thomash76)
Date: 2002-02-01 07:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=445709

I'm not quite sure if i made myself clear... ;)
In the new DTD the "entity" ELEMENT may contain a "list-cache-max" ELEMENT, but the 
definition of this 
"list-cache-max" ELEMENT is missing. A "max-list-cache" ELEMENT does also exist (as 
child ELEMENT of 
"defaults") ... but that one is defined correctly. So, was "list-cache-max" in the 
wrong position or war the 
corresponding ELEMENT missing?!

Sorry, if i misunderstood ...
Thomas

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom)
Date: 2002-02-01 07:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=251431

Type, I had both list-cache-max and max-list-cache.  list-
cache-max is the correct name.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=511632&group_id=22866

_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to