On 2002.02.04 16:33:43 -0500 Bill Burke wrote: > Why? What more functionality is needed? IMHO, Let's hold for 3.1.
The connection pooling/jca support has some problems and is not completely spec compliant. I think I'd like to change what the configuration looks like. If noone minds my doing that between 3.0 and 3.1, I can wait. david jencks > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc > > fleury > > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 7:24 PM > > To: Bill Burke > > Cc: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net > > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Can we have funtional freeze? > > > > > > yes I agree, we are almost there, only some speed issues in the > invocation > > and then we can put the DR1 for a while. > > > > We will need to open it up again for RC though... > > > > marcf > > > > |-----Original Message----- > > |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Bill > > |Burke > > |Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:13 PM > > |To: Jboss-Dev > > |Subject: [JBoss-dev] Can we have funtional freeze? > > | > > | > > |Can we have a functional freeze after beta comes out? We really need > to > > |stabalize all the new features and QA the shit out of everything. > Just a > > |suggestion.... > > | > > |Bill > > | > > | > > |_______________________________________________ > > |Jboss-development mailing list > > |[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
