I'm not saying style is not important, but to me your arguments have no objective basis that tell me how they ensure management scalability, hence its YOUR style viewpoint. While I thank you for sharing, I have no interest in renaming packages unless you can demonstrate a benefit.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 7:29 AM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Package organization > You are right... what _was_ I thinking anyways?!? Style... pfff who > needs it! > > I am going to go stick my head is a bucket. > > Code is important. Code is Art. Art has style. Therefor code has > style and is important. > > Of course the first two points are completely subjective. One might > think that code is not important (such an individual is not well > informed to how the new world order works), or that code is not art, but > a complicated chore to be banged out quickly just to get the job done. > > Of course, I think that my previous mail has more basis in scalable > organization than artistic style... > > --jason > > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
