On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > This is for anyone who knows Postgres out there, > > There is a patch at sf that suggest adding the following mapping: > > <mapping> > <java-type>java.util.Date</java-type> > <jdbc-type>TIMESTAMP</jdbc-type> > <sql-type>TIMESTAMP</sql-type> > </mapping> > > There is currently no mapping for java.util.Date, but there is a mapping > for java.sql.Date, which is: > > <mapping> > <java-type>java.sql.Date</java-type> > <jdbc-type>DATE</jdbc-type> > <sql-type>DATE</sql-type> > </mapping>
I prefer the latter. My reasoning, is that if java.util.Date is mapped to TIMESTAMP, then how does someone make a DATE in the database? They could use java.sql.Timestamp to accomplish that. This is what I have done for my debian packages. _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
