This answer could be taken in more than one way. Could you please be more specific?
--jason marc fleury wrote: >3.0 DR1 needs to get out the door, > >marcf > >|-----Original Message----- >|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason >|Dillon >|Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 3:41 PM >|To: marc fleury >|Cc: Scott M Stark; Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net >|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main >| >| >|This is a for a > 3.0 right? I think that for 3.1(3.2) I can have this >|shaved down to a very small footprint and highly embedable... but not by >|3.0. >| >|--jason >| >| >|marc fleury wrote: >| >|>Thanks Scott, >|> >|>Jason, making the embeddable Main is important. >|> >|>marcf >|> >|>|-----Original Message----- >|>|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >|>|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott >|>|M Stark >|>|Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:47 PM >|>|To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net >|>|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main >|>| >|>| >|>| >|>|- No explicit references to File or fileystems in the core >|>|- Dependency on a filesystem would have to be a dependency >|>|on a filesystem service with a more abstract API, for example, >|>|JNDI >|>|- Log4j intialization needs to be able to integrate with existing >|>|log4j usage >|>|- The embedded main needs to accept a parent class loader >|>|to which it delegates to >|>|- The current references to JMS need to be removed from the >|>|interceptors as this can be handled by log4j and we need >|>|to minimize the API requirements in low devices. >|>|- The base deployment information should not depend >|>|the standard XML descriptors directly. An object model >|>|needs to exist that would allow one to deploy components >|>|without having to go through a J2EE package. For example, >|>|it should be possible to take an existing service and expose >|>|it as an EJB without creating an ejb-jar. >|>| >|>|xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >|>|Scott Stark >|>|Chief Technology Officer >|>|JBoss Group, LLC >|>|xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >|>|----- Original Message ----- >|>|From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >|>|To: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >|>|Cc: "Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net" >|>|<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >|>|Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:57 PM >|>|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main >|>| >|>| >|>|> Can anyone find this information? >|>|> >|>|> --jason >|>|> >|>|> >|>|> On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 18:05, marc fleury wrote: >|>|> > I remember scott stark putting out a list of todos to make the >|>|embedable >|>|> > main real, like no reliance on filesystem necessarily, >|passing streams >|>|to >|>|> > deploy etc etc >|>|> > >|>|> > what would be the requirements to make JBoss totally embeddable in >|>|> > applications >|>|> > marcf >|>| >|>| >|>| >|>|_______________________________________________ >|>|Jboss-development mailing list >|>|[EMAIL PROTECTED] >|>|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development >|> >|>_______________________________________________ >|>Jboss-development mailing list >|>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >|>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development >|> >| >| >| >|_______________________________________________ >|Jboss-development mailing list >|[EMAIL PROTECTED] >|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
