JMX notifications david On 2002.02.24 00:49:38 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote: > I was thinking that logging would be less intrusive and easier for folks > to enable/disable when then wish... though I agree that JMX would be > better. > > Can you think of a way to allow this to be enabled/disabled and have > little effect on performance (on or off) with JMX? > > --jason > > > David Jencks wrote: > > >On 2002.02.24 00:13:41 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote: > > > >>Any thoughts about adding a new priority/level for logging stats and > >>metrics? > >> > > > >I'd say no, this should be done through jmx not logging. > > > >david jencks > > > >>--jasin > >> > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Jboss-development mailing list > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > >> > >> > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Jboss-development mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > >
_______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
