On 2002.03.04 23:10:25 -0500 Andreas Schaefer wrote: > Hi Geeks > > JSR-77 spec. is still changing and therefore a > moving target. > > I think that JSR-77 MBeans should be converted > to Juha's XMBean. Because I am too lazy to write > the deployment descriptors I am going to use David > Jencks XDoclet "jbossmx" to generated the XMBean > DDs. >
excellent. I'm hoping to move all the mbeans from standard mbeans to xmbeans when the xmbean is a little more stable. Will the jsr-77 stuff be implementable as interceptors in the xmbean stack? Will you need separate registrations for the "jboss" mbean view of the object and the "jsr-77" view? > This means that the only classes provided from JSR-77 > are: > - MEJB Home and Remote Interface > - various Statistics and Stats > > The rest is the class being the target of the XMBean which > still contains the static "create" and "destroy" method. Are these static methods required by the jsr-77 stuff? I'm trying to move towards "the mbean is the object". Already ejbs are mbeans (Container) and ejb-modules are mbeans. In the jca rewrite I'm working on the ConnectionManager is an mbean providing the ConnectionFactory service: no more loaders. I'm not all that familiar with these static methods, but I wonder how useful they will be if everything you are managing is already an mbean. Thanks! Keep in touch how this goes! david jencks > > Have fun > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Andreas Schaefer > Senior Consultant > JBoss Group, LLC > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
