User: jules_gosnell
  Date: 02/03/06 16:50:30

  Modified:    jetty    FAQ
  Log:
  clarify a little (for Greg)
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.4       +12 -12    contrib/jetty/FAQ
  
  Index: FAQ
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /cvsroot/jboss/contrib/jetty/FAQ,v
  retrieving revision 1.3
  retrieving revision 1.4
  diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
  --- FAQ       6 Mar 2002 00:45:39 -0000       1.3
  +++ FAQ       7 Mar 2002 00:50:30 -0000       1.4
  @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
   -------------
   
   A pure Java, HTTP1.1 httpd, Servlet 2.3 & JSP 1.2 WebContainer. In
  -short an elegant solution to serving static and dynamic web
  -content. See jetty.mortbay.org for more information.
  +short a 100% pure Java and elegant solution to serving static and
  +dynamic web content. See jetty.mortbay.org for more information.
   
   
   Why would I want to use Jetty instead of Tomcat/Catalina?
  @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
   
   Virtual hosts are an area currently not (AFAIK) addressed by the J2EE
   spec (1.3). There is an intention within the JBoss team to provide a
  -proprietary extension to provide this functionality. While this is
  +proprietary extension to encompass this functionality. While this is
   being worked out the interim solution is to go around JBoss and talk
   directly to Jetty via the jetty-web.xml file in your .war's WEB-INF
   directory.
  @@ -153,15 +153,15 @@
   requests)it's HttpSessions are still made available to other instances
   of the same WebApp within the cluster.
   
  -This extension is problematic since J2EE requires that on stopping a
  -distributed WebApp should notify HttpSession attributes implementing
  -HttpSessionActivationListener before passivating/distributing
  -them. When the WebApp has been restarted and re-activates an
  -HttpSession the same attributes must be notifies again. If, because of
  -the reuse of this fn-ality to provide fail-over, attributes do not
  -receive passivation events on one node before receipt of activation
  -events on another, an asymmetry, which would not happen on a fully
  -compliant AppServer occurs.
  +This extension is problematic since J2EE requires that on being
  +undeployed, a distributed WebApp should notify HttpSession attributes
  +implementing HttpSessionActivationListener before
  +passivating/distributing them. When the WebApp has been re-deployed
  +and it re-activates an HttpSession the same attributes must be
  +notified again. If, because of the reuse of this fn-ality to provide
  +fail-over, attributes do not receive passivation events on one node
  +before receipt of activation events on another, an asymmetry, which
  +would not happen on a fully compliant AppServer occurs.
   
   Our integration allows the user to specify whether this extended
   behaviour (snapshotting) is required and, if so, exactly what
  
  
  

_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to