Hi Geeks
After a simple test with direct JMX calls and MBeanProxy it seems
to be that both work without a considerably difference. So reflection
performance is out the door.
> My 2 cents: Keep the MBeanProxy, why?? CUZ i'm lazy. Are you going to
force
> me to do invoke("print", new Object[String.class] {}, new String[]
{"hi"});
> for a feaking print("hi");!!!! Get out of here.
> If I know ahead of time that the object is going to have the method, why
> can't I use an MBeanProxy with the interface that I know it must have?
> (Reflection performance not being an issue.)
Believe me I am lazy, too. But only when I doesn't hurt me otherwise.
Andy
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
