Keep in mind that, Most admins like to have thier ports fixed so that they know what holes they have to punch in the firewalls.
Regards, Hiram >From: Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Bill Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: marc fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jboss-Development@Lists. >Sourceforge. Net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Todo: multiple instances detection >Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 20:22:06 -0800 > >Couldn't the refs reattache to the invoker via JNDI, leaving them free >to use random ports... only JNDI would need a static port number then... >or am I missing something? > >--jason > > >Bill Burke wrote: > >>Maybe the invokers should run on a hard-coded port. With a hard-coded >>port, >>I think references can live beyond the life of the server. Or maybe I >>don't >>know what I'm talking about :) >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason >>>Dillon >>>Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 4:49 PM >>>To: marc fleury >>>Cc: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net >>>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Todo: multiple instances detection >>> >>> >>>Not sure that an external component is the best choice for this... but I >>>have not really thought it through. >>> >>>On a related note, I sent mail a while ago asking about the web service >>>for class loading wtr having it use an anonymous port. If we set the >>>default RMI port to anonymous too, then we only have naming, >>>jmx-html-adapter and web ports to deal with. Once the jmx-html-adapter >>>is a .war, then we only have naming and web. >>> >>>Does anyone know if it is possible to setup on public port, which then >>>attaches to other anonymous/random ports, switching based on the >>>content. This would make it look to clients like there was only one >>>port, but really there could be many, but the actual numer would >>>not matter. >>> >>>Something like this could (assuming it is possible) would make it easy >>>to integrate thirdparty plugins into the single port scheme which simply >>>need a port, with out them having to know about a special component or >>>conform to a specific api to select a random port or whatever... >>> >>>--jason >>> >>> >>>marc fleury wrote: >>> >>>>there should be a service that is part of the first services >>>> >>>coming up and >>> >>>>that detects if other JBoss systems are running on the same physical >>>>machines, this is to avoid port conflict as some services are >>>> >>>holding on to >>> >>>>some ports (e.g. naming on 1099, detached RMI, clustered RMI). >>>> >>>>We would then not start the naming as a duplicate nor the >>>> >>>detached RMI but >>> >>>>we would use the clustered RMI by increasing the connection port. >>>> >>>>This will enable people to run multiple instances of JBoss >>>> >>>without having to >>> >>>>manually change the stuff all the time. At least on the >>>> >>>services we provide >>> >>>>we should show how these behave. >>>> >>>>marcf >>>> >>>> >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>Jboss-development mailing list >>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development >>>> >>> >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Jboss-development mailing list >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development >>> > > > >_______________________________________________ >Jboss-development mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
