Guys, this is going to be great, seems like you are already deep into the topic. That´s fantastic.
IBM Public License seems to be an open license (as opposed to the usual Alphaworks non-commercial restrictions, right?), so you can go ahead there. I thought that they would have a small, non-production-quality server inside, too? Now I see, it is a part of the IBM Web Service development pack which is what license???? :-( For development purposes, having an integrated UDDI-server is necessary, yes. You would´nt want to register your test-beans at IBM or Microsoft, would you ;-) So maybe jUDDI is the choice, if there is someone behind it interested in collaboration with Jboss, the better. Peter is damned right: Every line of code taken from an _active_ community is better that doing it on our own, indeed. Since the ultimate goal would be in any case to switch to JAXR once we can distribute it in a non-discriminatory fashion (could someone of you please check the current Early Access-status wrt to that?), I wouldn´t care too much about the interface itself, but rather about the ease-of-integration in order to get something going and about the Places where we have to plug that into JBoss.net. Here are a few links, where we could have a further look at: http://www.opensorcerer.org/ http://soapuddi.sourceforge.net/ http://kuddi.enhydra.org/index.html http://www.uddi.org/solutions.html CGJ -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Peter Braswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Freitag, 5. April 2002 01:55 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] IBM Public License Phil, Looking over the IBM Public license, it seems pretty open ended and geared to open source development/extension.... On the technical side of the house, it seems to be only the client side. Its a start, we'd be able to register jb.net web services with UDDI test servers (HP, IBM and eeeck! Microsoft), but we wouldn't ourselve be able to act as a UDDI registry... the other peice of the puzzle.... I think we eventually want/need to do this trick! I wonder if we should try to get in direct contact with the jUDDI dude (I think he's a lone gun-man) and see what's up with his stuff??? It would be easier to help someone polish up some stuff that is *almost* there as opposed to building a UDDI registry from the groud up (yikes!). In the mean time, web service deployment with IBM registry client to a UDDI test instance sounds pretty damn cool to me... We'll have to get together and talk w/the good doctor (Christoph) and discuss about how the deployment process/deployment descriptor goes.... -pjb --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Peter (Braswell) and I were looking at UDDI > implementations for jboss.net > and the best one so far is UDDI4j. It is under the > IBM Public License and > we weren't too sure what the differences between > licenses are. Is IBM's > license open source enough for JBoss? > > -Phil > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
