Yes, I suggested this before, but Scott has put some Xalan thing in instead. SystemProperties are easier to understand...
Off topic, When's the baby due? > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jules > Gosnell > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 5:09 PM > To: Sacha Labourey > Cc: Jboss-Dev > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Deployment and config: one more thing, port > numbers. > > > Jetty has a useful construct in it's xml config. > > You can use something like: > > <arg> > <SystemProperty name="jetty.home"default="./">/config/jetty.xml > </arg> > > Jetty expands all SystemProperty tags accordingly. > > If we supported some such construct, users could choose what they wanted > to externalise (or override) with a properties file. > > > > Jules > > > > Sacha Labourey wrote: > > Hello, > > > > As the deployer/config issue is very hot these days, I want to > add oil on > > the fire ;) > > > > I see an interest in setting port numbers in an external config > file (le'ts > > say parameters.xml or port.xml, whatever). > > > > Then we would reference this file from our jboss-services.xml > files instead > > of disseminating port configuration everywhere in 8 XML files > and 3 SARs. > > Furthermore (and you will understand why I propose this), if > you want to run > > 2 JBoss instances on the same IP address, configuration becomes > a headache. > > > > Feel free to complain loudly. > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Sacha > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
