Great. Submit it as a patch and we'll figure out where to put it in the source tree.
As for JDOM, I thought we already used it, but I don't pay much attention to the JMX stuff. -dain Mike Finn wrote: > Dain, > > Coming well. Work just keeps getting in the way! Anyways, I should have it > ready this weekend/early next week. How should I package it, as a patch? > Right now, it is an MBean deployed as a sar, with an XML service config file > in conf (read/maintained by the SB manager). > > BTW - any plans to incorporate JDOM? > > #mike > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dain > Sundstrom > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 11:08 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss in a multi developers > environment > > > Mike, > > How are you coming on the ServiceBindingManager? > > -dain > > Mike Finn wrote: > > > Scott, Does the 'server name' (server identity) need to be part of > > the "getPort" request, if it is spec'd in the svc bind mbean > > config? if the server name was set on the mbean, then the port maps > > could be keyed off that (in addition to service name). So, the > > request for getport could assume the 'curent' server name for the > > port lookup. Or am I missing something? (been known to happen) > > > > #mike > > > > -----Original Message----- From: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 4:52 PM To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] > > Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss in a multi developers environment > > > > > > > >>> // The service JMX name String jmxName; // The virtualHost the > >>> service wants to bind to which may be null String virtualHost; // > >>> The name of the JBoss service instance to support always > >>> giving an // instance the same values String serverName; > >>> > >> > >> I'm lost. What is this? Can you give an example? > >> > >> > > Its what I have been referring to as the starksm and dsundstrom > > config instances. Say we setup two JBoss instances of > > main.jboss.org. As Dan is saying, I don't want to have to change my > > configuration to connect to my instance each time the server is > > restarted. So when Jason configures my instance he adds: > > > > <mbean code="...ServiceBindingMgr" > > name="...,service=ServiceBindingMgr"> ... > <ServerName>starksm</ServerName> > > > > > </mbean> > > > > while for your instance he adds: <mbean code="...ServiceBindingMgr" > > name="...,service=ServiceBindingMgr"> ... > <ServerName>dsundstrom</ServerName> > > > > > </mbean> > > > > Now there can be a static configuration for our instances for which > > the client ports, address in use is invariant across instance > > restarts. > > > > > >>> // The default port int port; // The default interface InetAddress > >>> bindAddr; > >>> > >> > >> Of these values, would the ServiceBindingManager only be allowed to > change virtualHost, port, and bindAddr? > >> > >> > > Yes. > > > > > >>BTW, do you actually like this idea Scott? > >> > >> > > Yes, its a definite improvement over what we have. In the future I > > would like to see this integrated with a client side naming service but > > as I said that is another layer. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > >> >>change virtualHost, port, and bindAddr? > >> > >> > > Yes. > > > > > >> BTW, do you actually like this idea Scott? > >> > >> > > Yes, its a definite improvement over what we have. In the future I would > > like to see this integrated with a client side naming service but as > > I said that is another layer. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August > > 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > > > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development > > mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August > > 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > > > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development > > mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Sponsored by: > ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Sponsored by: > ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > _______________________________________________________________ Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
