Don't allow that. Names have would have to be indicated as aliases using an object name form "alias:symbolic-name". You can detect duplicate aliases just as you can detect an attempt to reuse object names.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 6:13 AM Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] MBean interfaces to EJBs > It would make the ServiceConfigurator much more complicated, since it would > have to store non-object-names in the dependency list. It also allows > conflicts: what if 2 or more mbeans define the same alias? > > I'm still a bit doubtful about the real utility of this service, but if we > do it lets use a single immutable global file that has to be available to > ServiceController/Configurator when jboss is started. This is an easy > implementation, we can see if we like it, if we need more we can add them > later. > > david jencks > > On 2002.07.31 08:43:01 -0400 Sacha Labourey wrote: > > Instead of having a alias to mbean name in another file, why not simply > > have > > a <alias> tag available for mbeans i.e. > > > > <mbean bla> > > <depends [optional-attribute-name="blah"]>QueueManager</depends> > > </mbean> > > > > <mbean bli name="jboss:name=QueueManagerImpl,type=invm"> > > <!--mbean has a complex objectname--> > > <alias names="QueueManager,QueueSecurityManager"/> > > <!--... but defines aliases with well known generic names (possibly more > > than one)--> > > </mbean> > > > > => you define the alias in the mbean itself as a set of "well known > > generic > > object names" > > > > Maybe that's too complicated and the intermediary file is more easy to > > use. > > > > Cheers, > > > > SAcha > > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Michael > > > Stanley > > > Envoye : mercredi, 31 juillet 2002 14:28 > > > A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Objet : Re: [JBoss-user] MBean interfaces to EJBs > > > > > > > > > I Agree 100% > > > > > > Symbolic names are definitely a good idea. > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > Scott M Stark wrote: > > > > Yes that is correct. Changing one name in a well known file > > > > vs changing 20 names, several of which where in archives > > > > is a lot easier. Come on, the time you spent fixing the testcases > > > > would have been at least an order of magnitude less. It actually > > > > would have been zero because I would have just changed the > > > > mapping and not cared who was referencing the security manager. > > > > > > > > Independent of the ease of change, the point here is why even > > > > impose an object naming convention that we don't really care > > > > about on the end user. > > > > > > > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Scott Stark > > > > Chief Technology Officer > > > > JBoss Group, LLC > > > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 7:56 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] MBean interfaces to EJBs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>To make sure I understand what you are proposing... > > > >> > > > >>a global set of > > > >> > > > >><symbolic-name> == <ObjectName> > > > >> > > > >>and with > > > >><depends [optional-attribute-name="blah"]>some-string</depends> > > > >> > > > >>some-string is first looked up in the table as a symbolic name, and > > only > > > > > > > > if > > > > > > > >>not found we try to use it as an object name. > > > >> > > > >>This would certainly make changing the <ObjectName> half easier, but > > > >>changing the symbolic-name would be just as hard. > > > >> > > > >>This certainly wouldn't be hard to do, I'm still thinking about > > > my opinion > > > >>on whether it would overall reduce complexity and maintenance. I > > didn't > > > >>find changing the object name for the DefaultDS all that hard. > > > >> > > > >>thanks > > > >>david jencks ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
