If these changes break the existing JMX api and user MBeans in 3.0.x then don't commit the changes there. If it just affects the JMX implementation then they can be put into 3.0 for 3.0.2 if you want.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Brock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 9:53 AM Subject: [JBoss-dev] JMX Serialization and 3.0 > Hi, > > I'm going to commit the JMX Serialization changes specified > (at least partially) in the 1.1 spec. > This will give jboss serialization compatibility with other > jmx 1.0 and jmx 1.1 implementations/tools. > > I'm committing into 3.2 and HEAD, does this want to go into > 3.0? > I know there was a serialization change between 3.0.0 and 3.0.1 > at the invocation layer, can this branch take another one? > > Regards, > Adrian > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old > cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! > https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
