You need to write your own registry implementation. The JBossMBeanRegistry does not automatically add classloaders that happen to be mbeans to the loader repository which the BasicMBeanRegistry does. I believe our implementation of the ModelMBean is the XMBean stuff.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx On Monday, September 30, 2002, at 08:08 AM, Matt Munz wrote: > Juha & group, > > It appears that there are two registries available in > org.jboss.mx.server.registry. org.jboss.mx.server.ServerConstants > seems to > indicate that org.jboss.mx.server.registry.BasicMBeanRegistry is the > registry that is actually used. Is this the registry that you refer > to? > What does org.jboss.mx.server.registry.JBossMBeanRegistry do -- is it > being > used in the server? > > Also, I'd like to stay as spec-centric as possible. I noticed that > MBeanServer has a registerMBean() method. Any reason not to use it? > > Looking a little further at the spec and the implementation, I'm > getting a > bit confused, to be honest. I suppose that I need to create a Model > MBean > using the createMBean() method on MBeanServer. Then I suppose I would > set > the MBeanInfo (including persistence settings), and call register on > the > MBean. The only problem here is that the createMBean() method has > already > registered the bean. > > Does this mean that I am supposed to directly instantiate the Model > MBean? > I got the impression that the server was supposed to provide the Model > MBean > implementation. Am I missing something here? > > Why isn't there a method createModelMBean(Object modelObject, > MBeanInfo > info) on MBeanServer? > > - Matt > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
