Juha, It could be worse -- I could be trying to interpret legal documents ;)
> it is not clearly defined which it should refer to in case of MMB. It > might be better defined in JMX 1.2 version of the spec. Let me reccommend that the resource object constructor info be given a (defined) place in the MMB info in a future version of the spec. It seems to me that this information is required for MMB info persistence, and probably useful for MMB state persistence as well. For now, I'm just going to go ahead with storing this info in the MMB info object as mentioned previously. - Matt -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Juha-P Lindfors Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 2:51 PM To: JBoss Developers Group Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] How is Constructor Info used? On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Matt Munz wrote: > When I first saw XMBean XML, I assumed that <constructor/> referred to the > constructor for the resource (model object). On a closer look, it appears > that this information (ModelMBeanConstructorInfo) refers only to the > constructor for the MB itself. it is not clearly defined which it should refer to in case of MMB. It might be better defined in JMX 1.2 version of the spec. > Is this information being used in any way in the server? no, as far as I know > What purpose is it intended to serve? not sure -- Juha ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
