Thanks, I'd appreciate the higher detail level. We could have an xml file checked in that provided comments for the test results, merged into the report by test. I think this would have to be hand generated, unless we did something really tricky with bugzilla. Maybe one of the xsl experts would like to whip this up? I probably won't have time to try it for a bit.
Another thing that might be useful is a comparison with the previous results. We'd need an xml diff tool of some kind. I wrote one once, but a new specific one would probably be pretty easy. david On 2002.12.04 17:29:18 -0500 Scott M Stark wrote: > I'll look at using this transform for the 3.0 and 3.2 tests I'm running. > One thing I would > like to add is the ability to mark a failing testcase as a known problem > with its > associated bug to further categorize errors on stable branches where a > testcase was > added to track the state of a known bug. > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Scott Stark > Chief Technology Officer > JBoss Group, LLC > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "jboss-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 12:33 PM > Subject: [JBoss-dev] Tests on head working again, here's an example. > > > > I put I've modified the build scripts and xsl so that the > run-nightly-test > > target works for me on linux and produces some indication of what the > > errors are. Here's an example email generated. I find this level of > > detail on the errors appropriate because I can see which tests are > failing > > and often guess if I can fix it easily (for instance if configuration > has > > changed incompatibly), yet its not really long. > > > > I put a simple script to produce this in > > server/src/bin/co-run-test-email.sh. You need to set the email > addresses > > for this, make sure it is where you want it, and comment out the "exit" > > line to make it work. > > > > I plan to run this fairly frequently to check that I didn't break > things > > after checking stuff in. Is there general interest in having these > emailed > > to the dev list? How about setting up a test-results list? > > > > I can run this on jdks sun/linux 1.3.1, sun/linux 1.4.1, and mac osx > 1.4.1 > > (only tested on one so far). > > > > thanks > > david jencks > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Visual Studio.NET > comprehensive development tool, built to increase your > productivity. Try a free online hosted session at: > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr0003en > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Visual Studio.NET comprehensive development tool, built to increase your productivity. Try a free online hosted session at: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr0003en _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
