Are we developing this for the PHP community or the Java community? Or more important for the JBoss community? To me it seems that it would depend on who you are targeting for your user base. If you want to target the PHP users to bring them to JBoss, then Bill could be right. If we do not care about the PHP community, we go down the JMX way. I think the PHP community will never want to do anything with JSP. They believe they have what they need to be successful and will continue to innovate in their own circle. For most of the PHP community, what they have built is scalable to their needs.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Burke > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:51 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev > > The only negative comment I have in using JMX is that the PHP community > may > have a tough time switching over to Nukes on JBoss if you have to have a > package structure like a SAR or a WAR. I hate to say it, but does it need > to be "dumbed-down" for the PHP community? This type of community needs > to > be able to edit a JSP and immediately see the change on the webserver. Is > it possible to be all JSP based for themes, modules and blocks? You could > use a URL fragement and JSP:Include to decide what theme to use. > > Just a thought. Maybe JMX and such is the way to go. Just want to give > you > something to think about. > > Bill > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > julien viet > > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:31 AM > > To: SourceForge.net > > Subject: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev > > > > > > hi folks, > > > > JNuke adventure has started. > > After analysis of PostNuke I've began the development, still early > though. > > > > I keep everything that's good in PostNuke and throw all the shit away : > > > > modules, blocks, permissions system, url system and themes. > > > > JMX is used for PostNuke components : themes, > > modules and blocks are all JMX mbeans. Here are my reasons : > > > > A : general > > > > 1.we need a component structure, why not JMX ? after all > > another forum say that's lightweight. > > > > 2.theses components do not have to scale, i.e the number of modules, > > blocks and themes is very small. > > > > B : for modules > > > > 1.Ability to deploy/undeploy when application is running. > > > > 2.It's easy to deploy additional modules as a separate deployment and > > have them register in the same registry. > > > > 3.PostNuke is all about invoking module functions. > > Url like index.php?module=User&op=register means > > that the PN must call the method register on module User. > > For me that means that the servlet retrieves the mbean > > under the name jnuke:publicmodules:name=User > > and invokes the operation register(). > > > > 4.When a module is installed and configured it plug > > block mbeans in the JMX. > > > > C : for blocks, same reasons as above except 3 and 4 > > as invocation is typed for 3. > > > > D : for themes, same reasons as above except 3 and 4 > > as invocation is typed for 3. > > > > > > EJB are used for the model : > > > > UserEJB, GroupEJB, UserPermissionEJB, UserGroupEJB will > > be CMP 2.0 beans. We'll use local invocations and same trick > > as in forum to make them faster. Plus more beans. > > > > Each module is made of : > > > > 1.ModuleMBean : is the module itself, does not provide fucntionnalities, > > it's used to manager the PublicModule. Main operations are lifecycle > > (initialize, activate, unactivate, uninitialize) > > > > 2.PublicModuleMBean : is created when ModuleMBean activates and is > > responsible for serving requests. The MBean is dynamic and operations > > with no arguments and no returns are served. > > > > It's up to the module to do as he wants : if he wants MVC it can, it > > it wants to mix HTML and code, it can. First modules won't be MVC > > as they simply don't need. > > > > It's up to the model to have the persistence mecanisms it wants. First > > modules will use EJB. With lifecycle operations, each module can > install > > itself, for instance : > > > > a ModuleMBean is plugged : > > 1.module configuration, setup of variables > > 2.initialize : module can creates table, deploy EJB, plugs block. > > 3.activate : module > > then go to block admin and creates instances of blocks (if module > > use blocks), display them on the page. > > > > Each block is made of : > > > > 1.BlockMBean : manages BlockInstanceMBean. > > 2.BlockInstanceMBean : is a block instance, it contains a title > > and a position > > on web page + 3 operations : display(), edit(), update(). > > display() : displays the block instance > > edit() : used to edit the block in block administration > > update() : used to upate the block in block admin > > > > Each them is made of various callbacks that displays HTML on the page. > > It has to provide location of files like css, gifs, etc... > > THe first them I did is made of a servlet that register to JMX > > and the doGet operation serves the files. It's default theme. > > To make the thing simpler, it will be possible to make theme with JSP > > because I want to keep post nuke spirit. > > > > Ideally, even Module and Blocks could be made as JSP of things > > like that, that keeps > > PHP easy to do spirit. > > > > I did not thought a lot about permissions. In PostNuke, each > > module is responsible > > for checking security. I know that could be done with AOP but I > > don't know if it's > > gonna now, later or never :-) > > > > One problem is the configuration persistence. I don't know how > > our JMX implementation > > is far there. But if there is a restart, all config must be > > re-done. JMX persistence > > will save us there. Even though it's plain file and not JDBC. > > > > I will check out later (now it's a true mess), but I can say what > works : > > Themes + default theme is done > > block > > modules and module invocation. > > That means that yes, it displays me something that's nice to watch > > and I can invoke some operations although it's very early. > > > > So now, I am going back to code because time matters. > > > > julien > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en frangais ! > > Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte > > are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE > > Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. > > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Take your first step towards giving > your online business a competitive advantage. Test-drive a Thawte SSL > certificate - our easy online guide will show you how. Click here to get > started: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0027en > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Take your first step towards giving your online business a competitive advantage. Test-drive a Thawte SSL certificate - our easy online guide will show you how. Click here to get started: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0027en _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development