> And, finally, why did you tightly couple distributed tx logic with > invoker's implementation? Why is not it possible to write an > interceptor > that does distributed tx stuff that you've described but in invoker > independent way?
If only ole husgaard was awake :) I have been asking the same question for about a year and a half. I forgot the reason, which probably means it wasn't real, but Ole seemed to have one... marcf > > -- > Igor Fedorenko > Think smart. Think automated. Think Dynamics. www.thinkdynamics.com > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something > 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
