JBG has a number of support clients using JBossMQ in production 2.4 and 3.x.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aaron > Lindsey > Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 3:13 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JMS reliability (?) > > > Hi Calin, > While there is still room for improvement in the performance > category, I > believe the corruption problems with large queues is fixed in the later > releases of the 3.0.x series. If you use JBoss 3.0.5 or later, > you shouldn't > experience the problems outlined in points 1 and 2 below. JBoss > 3.2.x has a > new implementation that should help in high load situations, but I would > suggest using the 3.0.x series for production use. > > Aaron > > On Sunday 02 February 2003 11:17 am, you wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I saw a couple of worrying messages in the mailing lists regarding the > > reliability of JBoss implementation of JMS. > > > > Is JBoss' JMS reliable and suitable for production environment? For > > example for the scenario of an external client (or an another > JBoss server) > > sending messages to a JBoss server. > > > > If the answer is yes ( I hope this is the answer) , which JBoss > version is > > the most reliable and suitable for production? > > > > Any feedbacks really appreciated, > > Calin Lupa > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Muntean Horia > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 1:30 PM > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] jms issues > > > > Rob Finneran wrote: > > >Hi Listees, > > > > > >Just to give feedback, and not to rant too much: > > > > > >I have also seen the problems stated in 1 and 2 of these > messages. I had > > > to remove message queueing from my production environments > because of > > > it. IMHO, It would be very big plus if the JMS reliability > issues were > > > resolved. > > > > > >I hate to complain because JBoss has served me well, but I > would like to > > > use JMS more frequently in my production environments. > > > > > >Cheers, > > > > > >Rob > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "Ed Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:37 PM > > >Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] jms issues > > > > > >>Quoting Peter Fagerlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >>>torsdagen den 16 januari 2003 kl 03.49 skrev Ed Brown: > > >>>>Here are the list of problems that I ran into when I used > the JBoss > > >>>>implementation: > > >>>> > > >>>>1. If too many messages were queued up, and the server was stopped > > >>>> and > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>restarted, the server hung. > > >>>> > > >>>>2. Sometimes when the server was stopped and restarted, > the message > > >>>>queues seemed to get corrupted and the things wouldn't > work. I would > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>have to stop JBoss, manually remove the queues and restart. > > >>>> > > >>>>3. The message queues didn't seem to hold up under heavy load. > > >>> > > >>>DefaultDS is used per default unless You massage Your persistent > > >>>settings the above can result as perceived. > > >> > > >>The default settings were used when this happend. > > >> > > >>>1) I suspect a corrupted DB from a not clean shutdown > > >>>2) I suspect a corrupted DB from a not clean shutdown > > >> > > >>Shutdown was done using "CTRL-C" at the console. Since that > was the way > > >> to > > > > > >shut it down, corrupted queues resulting from shutdown was not > > > acceptable. > > > > > >>>3) Depends how heavy We talk here ? could also be my > introduced thread > > >>> > > >>>bug ? > > >> > > >>It was single threaded. > > >> > > >>>What was Your test setup HW/SW and JBoss version ? > > >> > > >>JBoss 3.0.1, on Windows 2000 and Linux. > > >> > > >>I'm not alone in finding the JBoss implementation of JMS > lacking. I've > > > > > >read the forums. IMO, it's not ready for prime time, for that matter, > > >neither is the JBoss inclusion of Axis. > > > > > >>But I've written enough. > > >> > > >>Ed Brown > > >> > > >> > > > >>_______________________________________________________________________ > > >>__ This mail sent via toadmail.com, web e-mail @ ToadNet - > want to go > > >> fast? http://www.toadmail.com > > >> > > >> > > >>------------------------------------------------------- > > >>This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com - A 128-bit supercerts > > >> will allow you to extend the highest allowed 128 bit > encryption to all > > >> your clients even if they use browsers that are limited to 40 bit > > >> encryption. Get a guide > > >> here:http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0030en > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >>JBoss-user mailing list > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > > >This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com - A 128-bit supercerts > > > will allow you to extend the highest allowed 128 bit > encryption to all > > > your clients even if they use browsers that are limited to 40 bit > > > encryption. Get a guide > > > here:http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0030en > > > _______________________________________________ > > >JBoss-user mailing list > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > > Until now, we use JBossMQ only with JVM protocol (i.e. facades sending > > messages that are consumed by MDB's on the same server) with File PM. > > We had no problems so far. But with external clients .... we > switched to > > MQSeries to do the work 'cause JBossMQ can't handle simple tasks like > > delivering reliable a message. Maybe the latest versions of > JBossMQ do a > > better job. > > > > Regards, > > Horia > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte > > are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE > > Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL > security issues. > > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en > > _______________________________________________ > > JBoss-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
