I still want to understand why there needs to be a TxSupport.clientInvoke. Please bring your thoughts/design public.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David > Jencks > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is bad > > > In this case the client side method to tx support map uses MethodHash > values as keys since the Methods themselves are not serializable. > Seems to > me that we should put the MethodHash values in the invocation to start > with. > > david > > On 2003.02.12 17:57 Scott M Stark wrote: > > > Another problem I see is that the TxMethod map is required on the > > client > > > side as well. Makes proxies even more heavy and what do you > do about a > > hot > > > deploy? > > > > The hot deploy is a general issue with proxies. Whether or not > this works > > depends > > on the transport endpoint. RMI/JRMP proxies do not work across a hot > > deploy, > > and most p2p transports do not. Making the proxies more robust > across hot > > deploys > > using our own transports, etc. is something we should work towards. > > > > A java.lang.reflect.Method map is a very anti-hot-deploy construct > > because of the > > strong typing of the Method to its class. We should certainly look to > > limit the exposure > > of such a mapping outside of the VM. > > > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Scott Stark > > Chief Technology Officer > > JBoss Group, LLC > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Bill Burke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jboss-Dev" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:31 PM > > Subject: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is bad > > > > > > > What if you don't have java on the client side? What if you're CORBA > > with > > > OTS? You're making it harder for Non-JBoss/Java clients to integrated > > with > > > us. I think this split should be undone. > > > > > > BTW, why the split besides code readability? Is the DTM dependent on > > this > > > at all? Is the TM even accessed on the client side? > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
