I meant to say "not" perfect. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill > Burke > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 11:27 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development > > > chris kimptons builds are perfect, but definately not useless. I'll be > setting up a nightly build as soon as I get my new machine. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jason > > Dillon > > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:53 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development > > > > > > Any automated build and reporting system would be valuable... just > > depends on the implementation as to whether it is useful or not. > > > > --jason > > > > > > On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 10:36 PM, David Jencks wrote: > > > > > On 2003.02.28 10:23 Jeff Haynie wrote: > > >> The problem really is with me - I fess up. Bill's mad because I broke > > >> the build twice this week by inadvertantly checking in code (throwing > > >> an > > >> exception that is the new overloaded version in 1.4) that only > > >> compiles > > >> on 1.4. Unfortunately, my whole work and home environment *DO* > > >> require > > >> 1.4 and only works under 1.4 - so I sometimes forget to > re-set my path > > >> to JDK1.3 when I compile. So, it compiles fine under 1.4. I'm > > >> changing > > >> my jboss build environment to force my path and JDK to 1.3 before it > > >> runs. Maybe be can update the build.bat/.sh to automatically do this > > >> (or at least check the version before you compile) and that would fix > > >> this problem for everyone? > > > > > > I don't think this is viable, since some features are simply going to > > > be > > > supported only on jdk 1.4. The primary example is working/reasonable > > > transaction logging: I think non-blocking sockets versions of > transport > > > will be another example. > > > > > > I really think a reliable warning service is the way to go. I found > > > Chris > > > Kimpton's compilation reports so unreliable I stopped paying attention > > > to > > > them a long time ago. Are they useful to anyone? > > > > > > david > > >> > > >> > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > >> David Jencks > > >> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:16 AM > > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development > > >> > > >> > > >> I'd prefer to have a reliable way to report these problems, since I > > >> don't consider it realistic for me to develop on 1.3.1. How do you > > >> detect them? > > >> > > >> For the particular problem of nested exceptions, I think we should > > >> always use the jboss NestedThrowable stuff Jason wrote since it > > >> provides > > >> a much more reasonable stack trace. Dain and I made as much as we > > >> could > > >> find of the jca and jta frameworks use this with good results. How > > >> could > > >> we make this better known and popularize it? > > >> > > >> thanks > > >> david jencks > > >> > > >> On 2003.02.28 08:42 Bill Burke wrote: > > >>> There have been a lot of build breakages lately because people are > > >>> using JDK 1.4 features and they break in JDK 1.3 builds. WE STILL > > >>> SUPPORT JDK 1.3. My suggestion? Stop developing JBOss with jdk 1.4 > > >>> and develop with 1.3. > > >>> > > >>> Please stop the sloppiness. > > >>> > > >>> Bill > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> ------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > >>> Welcome to geek heaven. > > >>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> Jboss-development mailing list > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------- > > >> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > >> Welcome to geek heaven. > > >> http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------- > > >> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > >> Welcome to geek heaven. > > >> http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Jboss-development mailing list > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Jboss-development mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
