Sunday, March 02, 2003, 9:15:33 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: JD> I think it might be better to use a different name non-ejb related... JD> but whatever... what about just persistence?
I like just persistence too. alex JD> --jason JD> On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 01:45 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: >> I think so. >> >> Is 'cmp' OK for the new module name, or is that too strongly associated >> with EJBs? Maybe 'persistence'? >> >> Jeremy >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >>> Behalf Of David Jencks >>> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:10 AM >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Subject: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module? >>> >>> >>> Would it be appropriate to put the new cmp framework in its >>> own module since it is not particularly dependent on ejbs? >>> >>> Are we going to move the ejb support into the currently empty >>> ejb module? >>> >>> david jencks ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
