Bugs item #650929, was opened at 2002-12-09 16:54 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=650929&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: James Strachan (strachancambs) Assigned to: Christian Riege (lqd) Summary: ejb-link doesn't work in deployment Initial Comment: JBoss behaviour has changed between Version 2.4.6 and Version 3.0.4. In Version 2.4.6, a reference from a Web Archive to a deployed EJB could be resolved using the ejb-link attribute of the ejb-ref attribute within web.xml. No jndi-name attribute is required from jboss-web.xml. This behaviour has changed in Version 3.0.4. Deploying a Web Archive with a valid ejb-link attribute, but no jndi-name attribute, results in a Deployment Exception. Fuller details of the problem , and of tests carried out, are set out in a Word document within the attached zip file. JBoss Version 3.0.4 OS Windows XP Home JDK 1.4.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Christian Riege (lqd) Date: 2003-03-13 07:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=176671 fixed in 3.0 series. Will be in JBoss 3.0.7 release ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Christian Riege (lqd) Date: 2003-03-07 10:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=176671 Backported the fix to Branch_3_2, still looking into 3.0. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Christian Riege (lqd) Date: 2002-12-12 17:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=176671 i have commited a fix for this in CVS HEAD. could you please re-check against CVS HEAD and tell me if it solves your problem; if it does I will backport it into 3.0 and 3.2 respectively. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James Strachan (strachancambs) Date: 2002-12-10 11:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=665462 Sample EAR file sent by separate e-mail. I have tested that this deploys. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Christian Riege (lqd) Date: 2002-12-10 10:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=176671 apparently the .ear didn't make it into the attachment, pls. send it to me via e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James Strachan (strachancambs) Date: 2002-12-09 20:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=665462 I will try to send you the complete EAR. If this doesn't get through, I will need to build a bespoke EAR, which will take time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Christian Riege (lqd) Date: 2002-12-09 19:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=176671 besides the Word document, can you also attach the .ear (or a stripped down version containing the Bean in question, a sample servlet calling the bean and the according Deployment Descriptors)? I have just comitted a test-case for bug #629145 to CVS HEAD, the test works with my patch in place (which has not been comitted yet) and I want to see if my patch fixes your problem, too before comitting and backporting to 3.2 and 3.0 branches. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James Strachan (strachancambs) Date: 2002-12-09 19:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=665462 Document attached (hopefully) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James Strachan (strachancambs) Date: 2002-12-09 19:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=665462 Am sending the Word document separately - my attachment may have been too large for SourceForge to accept. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Christian Riege (lqd) Date: 2002-12-09 17:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=176671 it seems you forgot the attachment, at least I can't see it in the report ATM. anyways, this is related to bug #629145 which i'm currently working on, see https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=629145&group_id=22866&atid=376685 for more information. have a fix for this in hand, just need to get around to add a testcase to the testsuite. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=650929&group_id=22866 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
