Nathan's design will not be based on JavaGroups, but will rather use JavaGroups as one type of transport mechanism.
Don't get all nervous; that's what I meant. 2 transports, one is the traditional c/s, the other one is implemented using JavaGroups.
I would rather see JBoss Remoting used as an abstraction with JavaGroups as a plugin rather than
JavaGroups at the center of things.
Tom, Jeff, Nathan and I have tentatively scheduled JBoss bootcamp in Atlanta to be the place and time for an in-depth discussion of whether Remoting can accommodate a one-to-many paradigm in addition to a one-to-one paradigm.
Nathan already has a thin abstraction layer over the transport, for both traditional and serverless design.
-- Bela Ban http://www.javagroups.com Cell: (408) 316-4459
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
