On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 14:48, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
> Are the jmx:${host.name}:rmi and jmx/invoker/RMIAdaptor different? I
> knew that the first one is just an old name.
>
> In fact, jmx/invoker/RMIAdaptor works but jmx:${host.name}:rmi does not.
>
jmx:${host.name}:rmi uses plain RMI.
jmx/invoker/RMIAdaptor uses jboss's invoker framework,
in particular the JRMPInvoker
In 3.2 jmx:${host.name}:rmi is now just aliased to
jmx/invoker/RMIAdaptor
But it still exists as a real deployment in HEAD.
Regards,
Adrian
> Thank you.
>
> Adrian Brock wrote:
>
> > Try it with the RMI invoker adapter
> > (bound at jmx/invoker/RMIAdaptor).
> > That does late unmarshalling of arguments
> > when the correct classloader is known.
> >
> > Vanilla RMI is pretty bad at hot deployment and classloader
> > selection.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Adrian
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
> Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
> Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
> Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-Development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
