the jmx module unit tests are the ones we run against, the ones in testsuite were never maintained.
At least 3 of the 4 failures on compliance are known issues (and reported as such), I don't know about the JMX 1.2 notification emitter one. The two errors are both related to classloading, at least at some point the loader repository impl. in 3.2 worked correctly with these, whatever the diffs in classloading were were not ported back to head. The error in head implementation tests is new, and looks like is related to classloading again. The failure is a known issue and reported as such. I haven't run the serialization tests, Adrian will know about those. I haven't run these against 3.2 for a long while, the number of failures seems high. Serialization-1.0 full failure seems to indicate it's not running against JMX 1.0 -- Juha On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Scott M Stark wrote: > What is the status of the unit tests in the jmx module as opposed to the > unit tests in testsuite/.../jbossmx? There are more tests in the jmx > module, but there are a fair number of errors. The 3.2 branch tests > for serialization are totally broken. Are the jmx modules tests being > maintained, and what is in the testsuite module vs the jmx module? > > The serialization tests in the 3.2 branch are totally broken. > > HEAD: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] jmx]$ ant test-compliance-full-JBossMX > ... > [java] Tests run: 926, Failures: 4, Errors: 2 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] jmx]$ ant test-implementation > ... > [java] Tests run: 67, Failures: 1, Errors: 1 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] jmx]$ ant test-serialization-1.0 > [java] Serialization Tests: jmx.serial.form=1.0 > ... > [java] Tests run: 93, Failures: 3, Errors: 16 > > Branch_3_2: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] jmx]$ ant test-compliance-full-JBossMX > ... > [java] Tests run: 926, Failures: 10, Errors: 2 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] jmx]$ ant test-implementation > ... > [java] Tests run: 67, Failures: 1, Errors: 1 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] jmx]$ ant test-serialization-1.0 > ... > [java] Tests run: 93, Failures: 0, Errors: 73 > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Scott Stark > Chief Technology Officer > JBoss Group, LLC > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > JBoss-Development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
