FWIW -- I think JSR-168 support in Nukes will be cool someday, and is probably inevitable, but I hope Julien pays _zero_ attention to it till at least several weeks after he's gotten 1.0 out the door and gotten some much needed rest.
Sorry to be blunt, but i detected a bit of tag-team pressure in this thread that IMO is insensitive to the phase the Nukes project is in -- coming down to the final _days_ of a 1.0 release. Every open src project has its own culture/netiquette, and perhaps some more tuning-in to the JBoss forums and pages and code would be wise. (BTW, i'm not in any way an "official" with JBoss Group or JBoss project, but just a user and supporter who thinks these guys are doing a damn good job.... and I want to help keep 'em on track to a good 1.0 release.) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3823740#3823740 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3823740 ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
