"acoliver" wrote : I think many of the things build magic does have been added to Ant.
I don't really want Maven. I'd like to see an ant-only build that does what we need.
.. correct. As far as you ('we' sic!) need. But many customers do not need the
monolithic download-or-checkout - run build.sh-buildmagic - use-what-you-get cycle.
Their business is too fast and has to be too flexible to live out of an unknown
(the-devil-you-know) dark black box.
Your point: it generates services for customizing the build and deploy of so-called
modules, like JMS only but with persistant messages and transactions.
My point: With a highly configurable and therefore model driven (POM!) build process
there will be much more service to do. For the customer improvements _and_ for JBoss
improvements.
BTW: 'build' in my humble point of view means always Test&Build, means always
developing, driving in production, migrating to the next version as a whole. The
lifecycle of a _product_ should be the result, not only the sometimes, somewhere
running binary.
bax
<a
href="http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3825908#3825908";>View
the original post</a>
<a
href="http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3825908>Reply
to the post</a>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
