"acoliver" wrote : I think many of the things build magic does have been added to Ant. I don't really want Maven. I'd like to see an ant-only build that does what we need.
.. correct. As far as you ('we' sic!) need. But many customers do not need the monolithic download-or-checkout - run build.sh-buildmagic - use-what-you-get cycle. Their business is too fast and has to be too flexible to live out of an unknown (the-devil-you-know) dark black box. Your point: it generates services for customizing the build and deploy of so-called modules, like JMS only but with persistant messages and transactions. My point: With a highly configurable and therefore model driven (POM!) build process there will be much more service to do. For the customer improvements _and_ for JBoss improvements. BTW: 'build' in my humble point of view means always Test&Build, means always developing, driving in production, migrating to the next version as a whole. The lifecycle of a _product_ should be the result, not only the sometimes, somewhere running binary. bax <a href="http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3825908#3825908">View the original post</a> <a href="http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3825908>Reply to the post</a> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development