I've been looking through the code a little. Here's a question for someone more knowledgeable than I: Given the described scenario, what if all my domain objects extend some common superclass DomainObject, and I add the DomainObject class to the Set of immediates (primitives) in org.jboss.cache.aop.CachedType? I assume my domain objects will be cached at the domain object level, rather than being deflated into the primitives of which they are composed (Strings, ints, booleans, etc).
Does this give me the cache consitency behaviour described earlier in this thread? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3854351#3854351 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3854351 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
