I'm not aware of this tomcat problem. I presume having a virtual file system would help, yet, I think interceptors and vfs could be solved seperately.
So, do you prefer the current deployment scheme plus interceptors (i.e. war, ejb, sar, etc. deployers with the ability to attach extra interceptors)? In that case adding interceptors will be an exception for cases likes Nukes or WebServices, so ordering may not be so important - we can just add interceptors first in the chain. The other model is to have all subdeployers being "aspects" in a single chain. I believe this is Adrian's plan for 5.0 but I don't know if this is realistic for 4.0. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3855909#3855909 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3855909 ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
