Dimitris,

can you point to a detailed description of the Tomcat use case?

Wouldn't it make sense to have independent binding services for TCP/IP and 
JNDI? They can have the "reverse-dependency" with the actual service that 
serves the user requests (Tomcat for port 8080). 


  | <bean name="Tomcat">
  | ...
  |     <reverse-inject name="portManager">
  |       <method="addListener" startup-level="created"/>
  |        <method="activateRequestsToListener" startup-level="started"/>
  |        <method="suspendRequestsToListener" startup-level="stopped"/>
  |        <method="removeListener" startup-level="destroyed"/>
  |     </reverse-inject>
  | 
  | </bean>
  | 
  | 

related to the lifecycle API thread:
http://jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=58509

To avoid the verbosity of this for each service that binds to a port, a binding 
interceptor might be appropriate.


Ivelin


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3861279#3861279

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3861279


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to