[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBREM-39?page=comments#action_12314721 ] Tom Elrod commented on JBREM-39: ---------------------------------
Nope. The socket invoker manages threads manually (as is done with the pooled invoker). The http invoker uses the oswego PooledExecutor. The rmi invoker does not have any direct interaction with thread management. I wouldn't mind adding ability to plug in threadpools, only problem is how to make this generic? Would want to be able to accept jboss, oswego, etc., but is no standard interface for these, right? > start connector on new thread > ----------------------------- > > Key: JBREM-39 > URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBREM-39 > Project: JBoss Remoting > Type: Task > Components: general > Versions: 1.0.1 beta > Reporter: Tom Elrod > Assignee: Tom Elrod > Priority: Minor > > > Overload start() method of Connector so takes a boolean. If true, will start > connector using a new thread, otherwise, will use current thread. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
