It should not be a requirement that this marshaller handshake be supported. There is nothing wrong with requiring that the client and server have to be in synch with regard to the marshaller configuration in order to communicate.
The ability to query for the marshaller either requires an admin message using some well know format (marshaller) or an abstraction that can even use some secondary channel to obtain the marshaller configuration (registry, local properties file, etc.). I don't see this an aop issue. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3864504#3864504 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3864504 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
