"ralf.siedow" wrote : Hello, | | we are using multiple tree cache instance which successfully connect to each other. If I want to prevent that I will use different cluster names. | | I've read the FAQ and the TreeCache HTML documentation and still have some questions unanswered: | - TreeCaches use multicast to announce them to each other, right? |
Not necessarily, this depends on the configuration of the JGroups reliable transport anonymous wrote : | - Do TreeCaches use multicast or unicast to replicate state? | 'Multi-point'. Multicast or multiple TCP connections, depending on the JGroups config anonymous wrote : | - Currently I didn't find any mechanism to define a common passphrase that is needed together with the cluster name so that only authorized caches can connect to each other. Are there any plans to do this? | This can be done on the JGroups level. Read JGroups/doc/ENCRYPT.html for an explanation of how to do this. anonymous wrote : | - How can I configure my cache so that it is only possible for to IP addresses to share information and they don't offer their content to "malicious" | Use a different 1: partition name 2: multicast address 3: multicast port you can and or or these together View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3865561#3865561 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3865561 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
