I don't really see this as an issue remoting should address any differently. The reason is that I see this as the responsibility of the client registering the callback server. If the server is not going to be able to call back directly to the client's callback server, they should use pull callbacks.
If the client does register a callback server that the target server can not call back on, it will throw the exception back to the handler. I think it is important for the invocation handler to know that the callback did not succeed in this case. However, would probably be good to provide an easier way for the invocation handler to remove the callback handler from the ServerInvoker (can currently do this, but takes some effort). View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3865716#3865716 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3865716 ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
