I sent this to a number of other lists, but forgot this one.  Apologies.
I actually just today checked in a pluggable bytecode API into
Hibernate.  Hibernate does now support either CGLIB or Javassist for all
bytecode services.

As an aside, our experience with CGLIB has been very good.  Juozas (one
of the CGLIB developers) is very active in the Hibernate community and
is always extremely responsive to any needs we might encounter.  My $.02

The reason for allowing Javassist to be used instead of CGLIB was merely
to allow a user choice.  Especially in the case of JBoss where Javassist
is used in a lot of places, it just makes sense to have the option to
not have to bundle yet another jar.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill
Burke
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 8:39 PM
To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies

Javassist is pretty good, problem is that it doesn't have a junit
testsuite.

Jason T. Greene wrote:
> I should clarify, for WS, we just need plain javabean generation. So I

> can add that to our list of things to do. BTW I was too harsh, there
are 
> nice things about cglib. I just ran into a lot of bugs.
> 
>  
> 
> -Jason
> 
>  
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of 
> *Jason T. Greene
> *Sent:* Friday, February 03, 2006 7:56 PM
> *To:* jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Subject:* RE: [JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies
> 
>  
> 
> I am all for this, cglib sucks...
> 
>  
> 
> -Jason
> 
>  
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of 
> *Scott M Stark
> *Sent:* Friday, February 03, 2006 1:47 PM
> *To:* jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Subject:* [JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies
> 
>  
> 
> So I have to introduce a proxy for a javax.net.SSLServerSocket which
is 
> an abstract class and so have to use cglib or javassist. I see some 
> proxy working in the head javassist, but this is not in the 4.0 branch

> version. We also don't bundle javassist with 4.0 currently. I assume
we 
> would rather have javassist be the only bytecode manipulation
framework 
> in jboss. Is there a timeframe for completing the javassist proxy so
we 
> can think about moving hibernate, webservices, cmp2.x, etc over to it?
> 
>  
> 

-- 
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Inc.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
_______________________________________________
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
_______________________________________________
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to