I will put jboss-head to the end and rearrange the list as Julien had requested. The portlet tests against jboss-head had failed and the report XML's were not well-formed, hence the failures not reported by CC. I have opened a task for this. Here s the link. http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPORTAL-679
Thanks Rajesh -----Original Message----- From: Ryan Campbell Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 3:54 PM To: Julien Viet; Rajesh Rajasekaran Cc: QA; jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: jboss-portal-2.4-testsuite Build Completed With Testsuite Errors Rajesh, can we put jboss-head at the end? If there is only one failure on jboss-head, perhaps we could raise the issue for the portal team to fix. Having Portal 2.4 compatible with Jboss 5.0 would be a nice thing to have if it's easy. If it's a big deal to fix, we should remove jboss-head from the matrix so we can have a clean build. -----Original Message----- From: Julien Viet Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 3:38 PM To: Rajesh Rajasekaran Cc: QA; Anil Saldhana; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Chris Laprun; jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net; QA; Julien Viet; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thomas Heute Subject: Re: jboss-portal-2.4-testsuite Build Completed With Testsuite Errors jboss-head (JBoss 5) is not today a target for us but we can test it of course. Here is the list that I would like to see : - Branch_4_0 - 4.0.4RC1 (later 4.0.4) - 4.0.3SP1 (already done) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
