The size really is not sufficiently different at this point to make a difference. We could also just explicitly label them as .gtar and let the users live or die by their tar implementations.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Adrian Brock > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 10:37 AM > To: Scott M Stark > Cc: Dimitris Andreadis; jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net; QA > Subject: RE: Simplifying the JBoss source/binary distributions > > If the tar archives are under utilized we could "hide" them > in a different section of sourceforge. > > That way, people that know about them and want to use them > could be directed to it. > > I think it is more a problem for people with slow connections > which explains they are under utilized nowadays. > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
