The jbossall-client.jar needs to have only jboss lgpl content as well. Throwing in asf licensed classes is a potential legal problem as what are the redistribution terms of this jar? I have had this argument with Sacha to no resolution so we should not be introducing an unknown complexity.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jason T. Greene > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 9:52 AM > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [JBoss-dev] Should 4.0.4 have cgilib in jbossall-client.jar > > jboss-head has cglib classes in the jbossall-client.jar, > however, jboss-4.0 does not, which one is correct? > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Jason T. Greene > Developer - Web Services > JBoss Inc. > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking > scripting language that extends applications into web and > mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime > developer group breaking into this new coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 > _______________________________________________ > JBoss-Development mailing list > JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
