On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 09:07 -0500, Scott M Stark wrote: > > It would potentially be possible to require the MC projects > > to be developed against head while still being thirdparty > > binaries in the main jboss-head build. > > i.e. You would checkout the projects separately into the head tree. > Meaning just dropping them from the jboss-head module alias and manually > checking > them out into it? If that is the case this should just be done > independent of the svn move just to decouple the mc code from jboss5 as > currently the only user of these is ejb3 as far as I can see. We just > need the mc artifacts pushed out to the repository. >
Ok, I'll do this. If you want to use JDK5 features, we should also look at make jboss retro binaries. I'll make JBoss-Head build on the JBossMC-1.0.2.GA binaries. Besides the bean deployer in varia, only EJB3 is using it until JBossMC-2.0.0M1 is finished. Then I'll update the WIKI page on how to develop the microcontainer until we have a proper standalone build. Cruisecontrol will also need updating once this is done. -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Adrian Brock Chief Scientist JBoss Inc. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
