No don't worry about time...

 All I am saying is that somebody posted a mail recently on the fact that
Castor was below O3 and that O3 provided an object wrapper.  I was always
bothered by the "raw" approach of Castor but have been educated/preached on
its benefits.  It might be the case that XMLSchema is just what some of the
folks trying to forget their DB pains have been waiting for, I don't know.

 In other words if Ozone can provide me with an object view of the whole
mess then I am *happy*.  I just don't want to deal with the "container-ish"
code of Ozone ;-) but that is another matter altogether.

marc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rick Horowitz
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 8:27 PM
> To: jBoss
> Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] How to model n-m relationships with CMP
>
>
> I'm not sure what you're getting at with regard Castor / xml, but no
> need to get into it further. I don't want to divert too much of your
> attention from jBoss to explain things that are futures, but if
> something gets written on the subject, perhaps you can remember to say
> something on the jBoss user list.
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Rick
>
> marc fleury wrote:
> >
> > Well if I believe the latest reports, it actually has Castor to
> do the xml
> > storing...
> >
> > marc
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rick Horowitz
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 4:19 PM
> > > To: jBoss
> > > Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] How to model n-m relationships with CMP
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't understand. Ozone is an ODBMS with its own persistent store,
> > > etc. Castor, if I characterize it correctly having not yet
> used it, is a
> > > mapping tool, relational db <-> Java objects <-> xml. How are you
> > > thinking of integrating with Castor via Ozone?
> > >
> > > Thanks again,
> > >
> > > Rick
> > >
> > > marc fleury wrote:
> > > >
> > > > O3 = Ozone
> > > >
> > > > marc
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Rick Horowitz
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 12:47 PM
> > > > > To: jBoss
> > > > > Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] How to model n-m relationships with CMP
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > O3? Please forgive my ignorance...
> > > > >
> > > > > marc fleury wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > we are *seriously* looking at an integration with Castor,
> > > > > probably via O3.
> > > > > > Daniel started this morning with us and he spent some time with
> > > > > O3.  Will
> > > > > > see...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > marc
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > Rick Horowitz
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 9:07 AM
> > > > > > > To: jBoss
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] How to model n-m
> relationships with CMP
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Do you have any plans to support n-m in JAWS, or perhaps
> > > do you expect
> > > > > > > to get this support from an integration with Castor, as
> > > well as with
> > > > > > > CocoBase?  If so, what is the status of that integration,
> > > and do you
> > > > > > > know if it will support CMP or will it be a BMP approach?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks very much,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Rick Horowitz
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Juha-P Lindfors wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Sascha Matzke wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I would like to know if it is possible to build n-m
> > > relationships
> > > > > > > > > using CMP (jaws).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This is not currently supported.  The forthcoming Cocobase
> > > > > support will
> > > > > > > > allow n-m relationships but that requires you to
> purchase their
> > > > > > > > product as it is not free.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -- Juha
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to