That's a nice stab at an explanation, but it can't be the whole story. Here's
a session-scoped component that's been working just fine in my application for
months now:
@Name("replogSession")
| @Startup
| @Scope(SESSION)
| public class ReplogSession {
| ...
| @In(create=true)
| private transient EntityManager entityManager;
|
| @In
| private Replog replogApplication; // local interface of the stateful
session bean above
|
| ...
| public Changeset createChangeset (String description) {
| ...
| Query query = entityManager.createQuery("from RepObject ro where
ro.replicatedChangeset is null and " +
| "not exists (from RepObject ro2 where ro2.replicatedChangeset
is not null " +
| "and ro2.version = ro.version and ro2.replicatedKey =
ro.replicatedKey)");
| List<RepObject> list = query.getResultList();
| ...
| }
That's a plain old session-scoped POJO that has an EntityManager injected into
it with @In. Works just great! I've never needed to use @PersistenceContext
anywhere else in my app. And I have an EntityManager Seam component in my
resources/WEB-INF/components.xml:
<component name="entityManager"
class="org.jboss.seam.core.ManagedPersistenceContext">
| <property
name="persistenceUnitJndiName">java:/entityManagerFactory</property>
| </component>
So why doesn't Seam's application scope support injecting that EntityManager
with @In, when Seam's session scope does support it?
Cheers!
Rob
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3967588#3967588
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3967588
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
