"mpr_prabhu" wrote : 
  | However would consider this as a defect in JBM as I expect it to handle it 
more gracefully and clean up expired messages or ensure these do not affect new 
messages
  | 

The JMS spec only requires that expired messages are never received by a 
consumer. It does not require that expired messages are actively expired from 
the queue before consumption nor does the JMS spec require expiry queues.

Having said that, JBM 2.0 will implement active message expiry from queues 
before consumption, probably with some kind of reaper thread.

However, even with a reaper thread, there can be no hard guarantees of timely 
expiry before consumption - that would be very hard to implement. The reaper 
thread will take a finite time to scan the queue, and during this time there 
would still be the possibility of expired message buildup if you send messages 
fast enough.

One thing I have thought about, is a new special queue type that may be useful 
with time limited messages (e.g. stock prices).

With the special queue type, you send the message with a special header, say, 
JBM_TIME_LIMITED_ID, and set the value to, say, your stick ticker code for the 
instrument, e.g. RHT. Then the queue itself makes sure it only maintains the 
latest version of message with a specific value of that header, and discards 
earlier ones.

E.g. if I send

Message A - MSFT price
Message B - MSFT price
Message C - RHT price
Message D - IBM price
Message E - RHT price
Message F - RHT price.

Then I start consuming from the queue I will only receive messages:

B, D, F - i.e. the latest prices for each stock.

Just an idea, but I think would be a nice feature and useful for some 
applications.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4135134#4135134

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4135134
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to