"alesj" wrote : "ALRubinger" wrote : | | 1) Decorator Pattern for anything wishing to leverage MC | | | I'm bad with names, if you can illustrate what this would do?
I use the term loosely for any wrapper object which adds behaviour to an existing implementation, just as you'd proposed. But Wikipedia defines it as a Runtime introduction, analogous (in final result anyway) to a Mixin in AOP (load- or instrument-time). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decorator_pattern "alesj" wrote : "ALRubinger" wrote : | | 2) Kernel is transparent, but available, to anything in the process | | | All MC core objects are services inside MC's Controller, so they can be easily injected. | But that means your POJOs are MC aware, not really a light decision to take. | But if that's AS5 building block, then it should be a np. | http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=133488 Hm, that does introduce an API dependency which in a perfect universe should be avoided. Problem is, not all of our code is or can be an MC Bean itself. Users of EJB3 have the same problem for unmanaged objects - they can't inject @Resource or @EJB, so they've gotta do a JNDI lookup. For AS5, we're already dependent upon MC for the Deployment API, and we'll probably continue this trend for Standalone/Embedded spins. Plus MC is a perfect project anyway, right? So let's get married. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4151364#4151364 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4151364 _______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
