JBoss 5.0.0.GA
Hi,
I'm exhausted searching for some enlightenment on whether the attribute
"mappedName" in @EJB is needed or not in a JSF Managed Beans. Could please
anyone enlighten me on this subject? I'm getting error message like "Resolution
should not happen via injection container" if I don't specify mappedName. I
want to avoid mappedName as much as possible. Or is it unavoidable?
Also, what's the difference between applying @EJB to field from applying to a
class? Consider the following example:
@Stateless
| @EJB(name="audit", beanInterface=AuditLocal.class)
| public class MyBean implements MyBeanRemote, MyBeanLocal {
|
| SessionContext context;
| AuditLocal audit;
|
| public void setSessionContext(SessionContext context) {
| this.context = context;
| }
|
| @PostConstruct
| public void init() {
| audit = (AuditLocal) context.lookup("audit");
| }
| // ...
| }
My guess is, if @EJB is declared at the class level, the container tries to
inject the session bean into java:/comp/env/audit JNDI name instead of
injecting it to the field directly as opposed to @EJB that is declared at the
field level. Did I get it right?
And it knows what EJB to inject in java:/comp/env/audit by relying on the value
of beanInterface attribute, is that right?
Thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4216203#4216203
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4216203
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
