Hi Markus, When a Remoting client and server are in the same JVM, the client will, by default, make a method call directly on the server instead of marshalling and unmarshalling invocations over a pair of sockets. For example,
| at org.jboss.remoting.ServerInvoker.invoke(ServerInvoker.java:853) | at org.jboss.remoting.transport.local.LocalClientInvoker.invoke(LocalClientInvoker.java:101) | at org.jboss.remoting.Client.invoke(Client.java:1640) | shows Client.invoke() calling LocalClientInvoker.invoke(), which calls ServerInvoker.invoke(). If the server were in a different JVM, you would see Client.invoke() calling BisocketClientInvoker.invoke(), followed by a sequence of calls ending with a socket write. By setting the "force_remote" parameter to true, you are telling Remoting to avoid the network bypass and call BisocketClientInvoker. That's OK, but when you add | <attribute name="force_remote">true</attribute> | to the MBean configuration, you're setting "force_remote" on the server but not the client. You want to add 'isParam="true"': | <attribute name="force_remote" isParam="true">true</attribute> | which adds "force_remote=true" to the InvokerLocator. The client then gets the "force_remote" parameter from the InvokerLocator. I think that should solve your timeout problem. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4219627#4219627 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4219627 _______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
